HOME    SEARCH    ABOUT US    CONTACT US    HELP   
           
This is an obsolete version of the rule. Please click on the rule number to view the current version.

8.119.209    CONTESTED CASE

(1) The revocation of certification may be contested in the manner prescribed in ARM 1.3.211 through 1.3.233.

(2) In a contested case before the department, the burden of proof shall be on the production company to establish by clear and convincing evidence that certification should not have been revoked.

History: 15-31-904, MCA; IMP, 15-31-904, MCA; NEW, 2013 MAR p. 335, Eff. 3/15/13.
Home  |   Search  |   About Us  |   Contact Us  |   Help  |   Disclaimer  |   Privacy & Security
For questions regarding the content, interpretation, or application of a specific rule, please contact the agency that issued the rule.
A directory of state agencies is available online at http://www.mt.gov/govt/agencylisting.asp.

For questions about the organization of the ARM or this web site, contact sosarm@mt.gov.