(1) The level of
analysis in an EA will vary with the complexity and seriousness of
environmental issues associated with a proposed action. The level of public
interest will also vary. The agency is responsible for adjusting public review
to match these factors.
EA is a public document and may be inspected upon request. Any person may
obtain a copy of an EA by making a request to the agency. If the document is
out-of-print, a copying charge may be levied.
agency is responsible for providing additional opportunities for public review
consistent with the seriousness and complexity of the environmental issues
associated with a proposed action and the level of public interest. Methods of
accomplishing public review include publishing a news release or legal notice
to announce the availability of an EA, summarizing its content and soliciting
public comment; holding public meetings or hearings; maintaining mailing lists
of persons interested in a particular action or type of action and notifying
them of the availability of EAs on such actions; and distributing copies of EAs
for review and comment.
an action with limited environmental impact and little public interest, no
further public review may be warranted. However, where an action is one that
normally requires an EIS, but effects that otherwise might be deemed
significant are mitigated in the project proposal or by controls imposed by the
agency, public involvement must include the opportunity for public comment, a
public meeting or hearing, and adequate notice. The agency is responsible for
determining appropriate methods to ensure adequate public review on a case by
agency shall maintain a log of all EAs completed by the agency and shall submit
a list of any new EAs completed to the office of the governor and the
environmental quality council on a quarterly basis. In addition, the agency
shall submit a copy of each completed EA to the EQC.
agency shall consider the substantive comments received in response to an EA
and proceed in accordance with one of the following steps, as appropriate:
(a) determine that an EIS is necessary;
(b) determine that the EA did not adequately reflect the issues raised by the
proposed action and issue a revised document; or
(c) determine that an EIS is not necessary and make a final decision on the
proposed action, with appropriate modification resulting from the analysis in
the EA and analysis of public comment.