(1) Phase I shall be for determining whether a qualifying community of interest
exists between or among exchanges. Upon receipt of proper application or proper
findings following a commission investigation, the commission will order the
regulated telephone company (or companies) and request any unregulated company
(or companies) in the exchanges involved to initiate a call usage study, which
shall be for the most recent three months for which data are available, to
determine calling patterns between or among exchanges (if there is good reason
to believe that one or more of the designated three months is an inaccurate
representative month, the next most recent month or months for which data are
available shall be included) . The study must be completed and filed with the
commission within 45 days of the commission order (an extension of time may be
granted for good cause) . In the event that a regulated or unregulated local
exchange company applies for EAS the call usage study may be submitted with the
application.
(2) A
sufficient indication of community of interest between the exchanges will be
deemed to exist if, for at least two of the three months studied:
(a) the
petitioning exchange averages at least eight calls per main billed account per
month to the petitioned exchange; and
(b) more
than 50 percent of the customers (based on main billed accounts) in the
petitioning exchange make two or more calls per month to the petitioned
exchange.
(3) If
the study demonstrates a sufficient indication of community of interest its
filing shall be accompanied by a statement of the company's (or companies') position on the requested EAS, with rationale for that position, and shall be
followed by a commission notice to interested persons with an opportunity to
object and an opportunity to request a hearing.
(4) If
the study demonstrates no sufficient indication of community of interest its
filing may be accompanied by a statement of the company's (or companies') position and shall be followed by notice to interested persons with an
opportunity to object and an opportunity to request a hearing.
(5) If a
proposed EAS arrangement does not qualify using the calling patterns in (2) ,
above, the applicant can attempt to establish, through economic, demographic,
or other evidence, that a community of interest does exist for the majority of
the
affected
customers. For the determination of community of interest in the absence of
qualifying calling criteria, the evidence and argument must be clear and
convincing. In this regard the commission will focus its consideration on
factors such as local calling for law enforcement, fire protection, medical,
and other emergency services. Other factors such as local calling to schools,
local government agencies, churches, shopping and service centers, agricultural
and civic organizations, and employment centers can also be considered, but may
be of secondary importance. In addition argument may be made that the call
usage study, although not meeting the threshold criteria, establishes community
of interest from another standpoint (e.g., the two-way pattern is
significant) . If this option to establish community of interest is pursued, the
applicant must file a notice of intent to establish community interest by the
time fixed for objecting in response to the commission notice referenced in
(4) , above.
(6) If
objection is received to the call usage study or if a notice of intent to
establish community of interest is filed or if the commission determines that
it is in the public interest, a contested case will be commenced and a procedural
order will be established.
(7) Following the contested case, or following the determination that no contested
case is necessary, the commission will issue an order in phase I stating its
determination that:
(a) a
sufficient community of interest between the proposed EAS exchanges does not
exist or that EAS implementation is not otherwise in the public interest (in
which cases the proposed EAS arrangement will not be eligible for petitioning
or consideration by the commission again for 24 months) ; or
(b) a
sufficient community of interest exists to justify the consideration of EAS
between the exchanges (in which case phase II will commence as provided in ARM
38.5.1315) .
(8) For
purposes of this rule and related rules, qualifying calls in "calls per main
billed account" and "call usage study" shall be limited to 1+
and 0+ calls.
Rule